On 2/16/21 9:07 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
On 21.07.2020 11:24, kato-...@fujitsu.com wrote:
So, after looking at these functions and modifying this patch, I
would like to add this patch to the next
I updated this patch and registered for the next CF .
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29
On 21.07.2020 11:24, kato-...@fujitsu.com wrote:
So, after looking at these functions and modifying this patch, I would like to
add this patch to the next
I updated this patch and registered for the next CF .
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2654/
regards,
sho kato
Thank you for working
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not tested
I have performed testing of the patch with row comparison partiti
>So, after looking at these functions and modifying this patch, I would like to
>add this patch to the next
I updated this patch and registered for the next CF .
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2654/
regards,
sho kato
pruning-with-row-wise-comparison-v2.patch
Description: pruning-with-r
Amit-san
Friday, July 10, 2020 10:00 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>Speaking of which, I hope that Kato-san has looked at functions
>match_rowcompare_to_indexcol(), expand_indexqual_rowcompare(), etc. in
>indxpath.c as starting points >for the code to match RowCompares to partition
>keys.
Hmm, I did
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:35 AM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:57 PM Fujii Masao
> wrote:
> > On 2020/07/09 19:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > > Please add the patch to the next CF so that it does not get lost.
> >
> > Is this a bug rather than new feature?
>
> I think it's a limit
Fujii-san,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:57 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/07/09 19:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Please add the patch to the next CF so that it does not get lost.
>
> Is this a bug rather than new feature?
I think it's a limitation rather than a bug that partition pruning
doesn't sup
On 2020/07/09 19:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
Kato-san,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM kato-...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
I made a patch that enable partition pruning using row-wise comparison.
Please review and comment on this patch.
Thanks for the patch!
Please add the patch to the next CF so t
Kato-san,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM kato-...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
> I made a patch that enable partition pruning using row-wise comparison.
> Please review and comment on this patch.
Please add the patch to the next CF so that it does not get lost.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
c: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: RE: Performing partition pruning using row value
>
> Fujita san
>
> On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 6:31 PM Etsuro Fujita
> wrote:
> > Just to be clear, the condition (c1, c2) < (99, 99) is not equivalent
> > to the condition c1 < 99 and
-Original Message-
> From: Fujii Masao
> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 3:20 PM
> To: Kato, Sho/加藤 翔 ; 'Amit Langote'
>
> Cc: Etsuro Fujita ; PostgreSQL-development
>
> Subject: Re: Performing partition pruning using row value
>
>
>
> On 2020/07
On 2020/07/08 13:25, kato-...@fujitsu.com wrote:
Amit-san
On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:53 AM, Amit Langote :
I think the only reason that this is not supported is that I hadn't tested such
a
query when developing partition pruning, nor did anyone else suggest doing
so. :)
Seems we can do
ed to hear this reason.
Regards,
Sho kato
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Langote
> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:53 AM
> To: Kato, Sho/加藤 翔
> Cc: Etsuro Fujita ; PostgreSQL-development
>
> Subject: Re: Performing partition pruning using row value
>
> Ka
Kato-san,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:32 AM kato-...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 6:31 PM Etsuro Fujita
> wrote:
> > Just to be clear, the condition (c1, c2) < (99, 99) is not equivalent to the
> > condition c1 < 99 and c2 < 99 (see the documentation note in [1]).
>
> Thanks for
POC that allows row-wise comparison with partition-pruning.
Regards,
sho kato
> -Original Message-
> From: Etsuro Fujita
> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 6:31 PM
> To: Kato, Sho/加藤 翔
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Performing partition pruning using row val
Kato-san,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:25 PM kato-...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
> I would like to ask about the conditions under which partition pruning is
> performed.
> In PostgreSQL 12, when I executed following SQL, partition pruning is not
> performed.
>
> postgres=# explain select * from a where (c1
16 matches
Mail list logo
