On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 7:01 PM Eduard Stefes wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 13:53 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> > v3 still has direct-call and runtime-check paths. Let's keep only
> > USE_S390X_CRC32C_WITH_RUNTIME_CHECK and discard the direct call
> > configure checks. Once that's done I'll take
Hi,
On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 13:53 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> v3 still has direct-call and runtime-check paths. Let's keep only
> USE_S390X_CRC32C_WITH_RUNTIME_CHECK and discard the direct call
> configure checks. Once that's done I'll take a closer look and test
> as
> well. The rest should be sma
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 6:46 PM Eduard Stefes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here is V3 of the patch. Changes from V2:
>
> - removed IBM copyright
> - removed GETAUXVAL check in favor of the already provided check
> - moved runtime selection code from pg_crc32c_s390x_choose.c to
> pg_crc32c_s390x.c and removed
Hi,
here is V3 of the patch. Changes from V2:
- removed IBM copyright
- removed GETAUXVAL check in favor of the already provided check
- moved runtime selection code from pg_crc32c_s390x_choose.c to
pg_crc32c_s390x.c and removed _choose.c file
- removed the config time compiler check and let the
Hi,
On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 13:48 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Hi Eduard, thanks for the update. Note, it's not necessary to change
> the thread subject, and in fact I came very close to missing this
> email entirely.
Sorry for the confusion.
> Secondly, I haven't seen a response about the copyr
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 2:15 PM Eduard Stefes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So here is V2 of the crc32c_s390x patch. Changes from V1 are:
Hi Eduard, thanks for the update. Note, it's not necessary to change
the thread subject, and in fact I came very close to missing this
email entirely.
Secondly, I haven't
