Hi David,
I have a question that is a specification of permission check
(visibilityrule) for psql meta-command with schema option.
Visibility means search_path, not permission. If s_a is not in the
search_paths it objects are not visible unqualified but can be seen (catalog)
when sch
On Sunday, November 7, 2021, Tatsuro Yamada
wrote:
>
> I have a question that is a specification of permission check
> (visibilityrule) for psql meta-command with schema option.
>
> From the above results, I expected "\dX s_a.*" doesn't show any info
> as same as "\dX". but info is displayed. I'm
On Sunday, November 7, 2021, Tatsuro Yamada
wrote:
>
> According to the source code [1], there is no check if a schema
> option is added. As a result, a role that is not granted can see
> other roles' object names.
> We might say it's okay because it's a name, not contents (data),
> but It seems
Hi,
I have a question that is a specification of permission check
(visibilityrule) for psql meta-command with schema option.
According to the source code [1], there is no check if a schema
option is added. As a result, a role that is not granted can see
other roles' object names.
We might say it
