Hi John,
Thanks for the feedback. This is v5 of the patchset, updated following your
comments:
- Moved the function pointer definitions out of common headers and
into src/port, consistent with existing practice.
Thanks again for the guidance.
Best regards,
Kim Andrew
Hi John,
Thanks for the feedback. This is v5 of the patchset, updated following your
comments:
- Moved the function pointer definitions out of common headers and
into src/port, consistent with existing practice.
Thanks again for the guidance.
Best regards,
Kim Andrew
> I don't know if this is related to the crashes, but it doesn't seem
> like a good idea to #include the function pointer stuff everywhere,
> that should probably go into src/port like the others.
Just a gentle reminder on this patch series — I’ve already rebased it on
the latest tip of master and
Hi John,
Thanks for the feedback. This is v5 of the patchset, updated following your
comments:
- Moved the function pointer definitions out of common headers and
into src/port, consistent with existing practice.
Thanks again for the guidance.
Best regards,
Kim Andrew
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 4:54 AM Matthew Sterrett
wrote:
> Okay, I've determined that versions of LLVM/Clang before 19 crash when
> compiling this patch for some reason; it seems that both make
> check-world and make install will crash with the affected LLVM
> versions.
> Unfortunately, what matter
> You can see the failure at the artifacts ->
> 'log/tmp_install/log/install.log' file on the CI web page [1].
>
> If you want to replicate that on your local:
>
> $ ./configure --with-llvm CLANG="ccache clang-16"
> $ make -s -j8 world-bin
> $ make -j8 check-world
>
> should be enough. I was able t
Hi,
On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 02:54, Matthew Sterrett
wrote:
>
> Hello! Thanks for helping me with this.
> I'm still trying to figure out what is going on with the Bookworm test
> failures. I'm pretty sure this patchset should resolve all the issues
> with the macOS build, but I don't think it will
Hello! Thanks for helping me with this.
I'm still trying to figure out what is going on with the Bookworm test
failures. I'm pretty sure this patchset should resolve all the issues
with the macOS build, but I don't think it will help the linux
failures unfortunately.
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 4:02 A
On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 6:57 AM Matthew Sterrett
wrote:
> Hello! I'm still trying to figure out those CI failures, I just wanted
> to update things.
>
> From my testing, with this patch repeatedly disabling/enabling
> checksums is about 12.4% on an approximately 15 GB database.
>
> By the way, I'd
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 6:01 PM Stepan Neretin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 6:57 AM Matthew Sterrett <
> matthewsterre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello! I'm still trying to figure out those CI failures, I just wanted
>> to update things.
>>
>> From my testing, with this patch repeatedly dis
Hello! I'm still trying to figure out those CI failures, I just wanted
to update things.
>From my testing, with this patch repeatedly disabling/enabling
checksums is about 12.4% on an approximately 15 GB database.
By the way, I'd love it if anyone could help me figure out how to
replicate a CI fa
Hello,
This patch enables more compiler autovectorization for the checksum
calculations.
This code is particularly well suited for autovectorization, so just
adding pg_attribute_target and some simple dynamic dispatch logic we
can get improved vectorization.
This gives about a 2x speedup in a synth
12 matches
Mail list logo
