Re: Probably typo in multixact.c

2020-10-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 10:26:39AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:15:35AM +, Hou, Zhijie wrote: > > Hi > > > > In multixact.c I found some comments like the following: > > > > * Similar to AtEOX_MultiXact but for COMMIT PREPARED > > * Discard the local Mu

Re: Probably typo in multixact.c

2020-10-07 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:15:35AM +, Hou, Zhijie wrote: > Hi > > In multixact.c I found some comments like the following: > > * Similar to AtEOX_MultiXact but for COMMIT PREPARED > * Discard the local MultiXactId cache like in AtEOX_MultiXact > > Since there's no function called

Probably typo in multixact.c

2020-10-07 Thread Hou, Zhijie
Hi In multixact.c I found some comments like the following: * Similar to AtEOX_MultiXact but for COMMIT PREPARED * Discard the local MultiXactId cache like in AtEOX_MultiXact Since there's no function called "AtEOX_MultiXact" in the code, I think the "AtEOX_MultiXact" may be a typo