On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:36 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
> Yeah. Patch attached.
Pushed.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:54 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> While re-reading heap_update() in connection with that PANIC we're
> chasing, my attention was drawn to this comment:
>
> /*
> * Note: beyond this point, use oldtup not otid to refer to old tuple.
> * otid may very well point at newtu
While re-reading heap_update() in connection with that PANIC we're
chasing, my attention was drawn to this comment:
/*
* Note: beyond this point, use oldtup not otid to refer to old tuple.
* otid may very well point at newtup->t_self, which we will overwrite
* with the new tuple
