On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 8:30 AM Melanie Plageman
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 6:07 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to push this fix up to HEAD and v17 early next week, unless
> > there is no objection.
>
> I started studying this again looking back at the thread associated
> with
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 6:07 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> I'm going to push this fix up to HEAD and v17 early next week, unless
> there is no objection.
I started studying this again looking back at the thread associated
with commit c120550edb86. There was actually a long discussion about
how thi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 3:29 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 3:12 PM Melanie Plageman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 6:03 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > With commit c120550edb86, If we got the cleanup lock on the page,
> > > lazy_scan_prune() marks dea
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 3:12 PM Melanie Plageman
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 6:03 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > With commit c120550edb86, If we got the cleanup lock on the page,
> > lazy_scan_prune() marks dead item IDs directly to LP_UNUSED. So the
> > following check with has_lpdead_
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 6:03 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> With commit c120550edb86, If we got the cleanup lock on the page,
> lazy_scan_prune() marks dead item IDs directly to LP_UNUSED. So the
> following check with has_lpdead_items made the periodic FSM vacuum in
> the one-pass strategy vacuum
Hi,
With commit c120550edb86, If we got the cleanup lock on the page,
lazy_scan_prune() marks dead item IDs directly to LP_UNUSED. So the
following check with has_lpdead_items made the periodic FSM vacuum in
the one-pass strategy vacuum no longer being triggered:
if (got_cleanup_lock
