Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-24 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Munro writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> For entertainment's sake, I tried building --with-llvm on FreeBSD 12 >> arm64 (hey, gotta do something with this raspberry pi toy I got). > Neat. Quite tempted to get one! Fair warning: the newest "3B+" model contains n

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-24 Thread Thomas Munro
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Munro writes: >> BTW It is working on arm64 too, starting with LLVM 6. 5 crashed the >> same way as it does on ppc. See build farm member eelpout which is >> running Debian. > > For entertainment's sake, I tried building --with-llvm on F

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-23 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Munro writes: > BTW It is working on arm64 too, starting with LLVM 6. 5 crashed the > same way as it does on ppc. See build farm member eelpout which is > running Debian. For entertainment's sake, I tried building --with-llvm on FreeBSD 12 arm64 (hey, gotta do something with this raspber

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-23 Thread Thomas Munro
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Andres Freund 2018-05-23 > <20180523205521.mdzwldqabriup...@alap3.anarazel.de> >> What I meant was that I'd conditionally enable it for the other archs >> when the version is >= 7. > > Good idea, but unfortunately there's a bunch of arc

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-23 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Andres Freund 2018-05-23 <20180523205521.mdzwldqabriup...@alap3.anarazel.de> > What I meant was that I'd conditionally enable it for the other archs > when the version is >= 7. Good idea, but unfortunately there's a bunch of architectures on ports.debian.org that llvm hasn't been ported to yet

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-23 Thread Andres Freund
On 2018-05-23 22:45:26 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Andres Freund 2018-05-23 > <38f42310-62ac-48b1-8a83-639b97e5f...@anarazel.de> > > >I've disabled --with-llvm on all platforms except amd64 i386 now. Will > > >try talking to the llvm maintainers in Debian to see if we can get > > >this fixe

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-23 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Andres Freund 2018-05-23 <38f42310-62ac-48b1-8a83-639b97e5f...@anarazel.de> > >I've disabled --with-llvm on all platforms except amd64 i386 now. Will > >try talking to the llvm maintainers in Debian to see if we can get > >this fixed and have more coverage. > > How about making that dependant

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-23 Thread Andres Freund
On May 23, 2018 4:59:00 AM PDT, Christoph Berg wrote: >Re: Andres Freund 2018-05-22 ><20180522151101.drsbh6p7ltxpm...@alap3.anarazel.de> >> Hi, >> >> On 2018-05-22 16:33:57 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: >> > PG 11 beta1 is failing on ppc64el. All Debian/Ubuntu releases >except >> > Jessie are af

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-23 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Andres Freund 2018-05-22 <20180522151101.drsbh6p7ltxpm...@alap3.anarazel.de> > Hi, > > On 2018-05-22 16:33:57 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > PG 11 beta1 is failing on ppc64el. All Debian/Ubuntu releases except > > Jessie are affected. My guess is on problems with llvm/jit, because of > > the

Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-22 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2018-05-22 16:33:57 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > PG 11 beta1 is failing on ppc64el. All Debian/Ubuntu releases except > Jessie are affected. My guess is on problems with llvm/jit, because of > the C++ style error message (and LLVM is disabled on Jessie). It was bug in LLVM that's fixed n

PG11 jit failing on ppc64el

2018-05-22 Thread Christoph Berg
PG 11 beta1 is failing on ppc64el. All Debian/Ubuntu releases except Jessie are affected. My guess is on problems with llvm/jit, because of the C++ style error message (and LLVM is disabled on Jessie). Debian sid: 15:59:29 2018-05-22 13:59:24.914 UTC [29081] pg_regress/strings STATEMENT: SELECT