On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:48 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 3 Jun 2021, at 04:07, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Here's a patch to remove the misleading comments.
>
> While not an expert in the area; reading the referenced commit and the code
> with the now removed comments, I think this is correct.
> On 3 Jun 2021, at 04:07, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Here's a patch to remove the misleading comments.
While not an expert in the area; reading the referenced commit and the code
with the now removed comments, I think this is correct.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:11 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
> In passing I noticed that lwlock.c contains 3 comments about bogus
> wakeups due to sharing proc->sem with the heavyweight lock manager and
> ProcWaitForSignal. Commit 675f55e (9.5) switched those things
> from proc->sem to proc->procLatch
Hi,
In passing I noticed that lwlock.c contains 3 comments about bogus
wakeups due to sharing proc->sem with the heavyweight lock manager and
ProcWaitForSignal. Commit 675f55e (9.5) switched those things
from proc->sem to proc->procLatch. ProcArrayGroupClearXid() and
TransactionGroupUpdateXi
