Hi Andres,
On 7/1/2025 10:06 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2025-07-01 09:57:18 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2025-06-26 13:07:49 +0800, Zhou, Zhiguo wrote:
This patch addresses severe LWLock contention observed on high-core systems
where hundreds of processors concurrently access frequentl
On 6/26/2025 1:07 PM, Zhou, Zhiguo wrote:
Hi Hackers,
This patch addresses severe LWLock contention observed on high-core systems
where hundreds of processors concurrently access frequently-shared locks.
Specifically for ProcArrayLock (exhibiting 93.5% shared-mode acquires), we
implement a new
Hi,
On 2025-07-01 09:57:18 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-06-26 13:07:49 +0800, Zhou, Zhiguo wrote:
> > This patch addresses severe LWLock contention observed on high-core systems
> > where hundreds of processors concurrently access frequently-shared locks.
> > Specifically for ProcArrayLoc
Hi,
On 2025-06-26 13:07:49 +0800, Zhou, Zhiguo wrote:
> This patch addresses severe LWLock contention observed on high-core systems
> where hundreds of processors concurrently access frequently-shared locks.
> Specifically for ProcArrayLock (exhibiting 93.5% shared-mode acquires), we
> implement a
Hi Hackers,
This patch addresses severe LWLock contention observed on high-core systems
where hundreds of processors concurrently access frequently-shared locks.
Specifically for ProcArrayLock (exhibiting 93.5% shared-mode acquires), we
implement a new ReadBiasedLWLock mechanism to eliminate the
