Re: Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

2019-06-17 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:28:42PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 14 Jun 2019, at 01:00, Thomas Munro wrote: > >> Commit 675f switched from a semaphore-based waiting to latch-based >> waiting for ProcSleep()/ProcWakeup(), but left behind some stray >> references to semaphores. PSA. >

Re: Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

2019-06-17 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 14 Jun 2019, at 01:00, Thomas Munro wrote: > Commit 675f switched from a semaphore-based waiting to latch-based > waiting for ProcSleep()/ProcWakeup(), but left behind some stray > references to semaphores. PSA. LGTM cheers ./daniel

Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

2019-06-13 Thread Thomas Munro
Hi, Commit 675f switched from a semaphore-based waiting to latch-based waiting for ProcSleep()/ProcWakeup(), but left behind some stray references to semaphores. PSA. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com 0001-Remove-obsolete-comments-about-sempahores-from-proc..patch Description: Bina