On 2020-09-03 17:40, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
I just noticed that both this and the command link patch modified the
same sentence about CREATE DATABASE and pg_database, so those changes
seem to have been lost in the merge. Attached is a follow-up patch that
adds them both.
I think in th
Hi Peter,
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2020-06-21 19:49, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> There were only three cases of multiple mentions of the same table in a
>> single paragraph, I've removed them in the attached patch.
>>
>> I've also added a second patch that makes the SQL commands link
On 2020-06-21 19:49, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
There were only three cases of multiple mentions of the same table in a
single paragraph, I've removed them in the attached patch.
I've also added a second patch that makes the SQL commands links. There
were some cases of the same commands be
Hello Tom,
I didn't think there was much point in linkifying both in that case,
and other similar situations.
The point is that the user reads a sentence, attempts to jump but
sometimes can't, because the is not the first occurrence. I'd go for
all mentions of another relation should be li
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2020-Jun-21, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> That has not been our practice up to now, eg in comparable cases in
>> discussions of GUC variables, only the first reference is xref-ified.
>> I think it could be kind of annoying to make every reference a link,
>> both for regular re
On 2020-Jun-21, Tom Lane wrote:
> That has not been our practice up to now, eg in comparable cases in
> discussions of GUC variables, only the first reference is xref-ified.
> I think it could be kind of annoying to make every reference a link,
> both for regular readers (the link decoration is to
Fabien COELHO writes:
>> I didn't think there was much point in linkifying both in that case, and
>> other similar situations.
> The point is that the user reads a sentence, attempts to jump but
> sometimes can't, because the is not the first occurrence. I'd go for all
> mentions of another rel
Hi Fabien,
Fabien COELHO writes:
>> It's the first mention in the introductory paragraph of _each_ catalog
>> table/view page, not the first mention in the entire catalogs.sgml file.
>> E.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-aggregate.html
>> has two mentions of pg_proc one word
Hello Dagfinn,
The attached patch
applies cleanly, doc generation is ok. I'm ok with adding such links
systematically.
makes the first mention of another system catalog or view (as well as
pg_hba.conf in pg_hba_file_lines) a link, for easier navigation.
Why only the first mention? It se
Fabien COELHO writes:
> Hello Dagfinn,
>
>>> The attached patch makes the first mention of another system catalog or
>>> view (as well as pg_hba.conf in pg_hba_file_lines) a link, for easier
>>> navigation.
>
> Why only the first mention? It seems unlikely that I would ever read
> such chapter li
Hello Dagfinn,
The attached patch makes the first mention of another system catalog or
view (as well as pg_hba.conf in pg_hba_file_lines) a link, for easier
navigation.
Why only the first mention? It seems unlikely that I would ever read such
chapter linearly, and even so that I would want
ilm...@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker) writes:
> ilm...@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker) writes:
>
>> The attached patch makes the first mention of another system catalog or
>> view (as well as pg_hba.conf in pg_hba_file_lines) a link, for easier
>> navigation.
>
> bump...
Added to the
ilm...@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker) writes:
> The attached patch makes the first mention of another system catalog or
> view (as well as pg_hba.conf in pg_hba_file_lines) a link, for easier
> navigation.
bump...
- ilmari
--
"A disappointingly low fraction of the human race is,
at any
Hi hackers,
While browsing the system catalog docs earlier I noticed that a lot of
them mention other catalogs or views in the introductory paragrah
without hyperlinking them. Now, most of these are linked in the
"references" column in the table, but some, like pg_proc's mention of
pg_aggregate h
14 matches
Mail list logo