On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:11:06PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> Adding a TOAST can cause circular dependencies between those relations?? If
> you don't mind can you explain more about it?
The difficult task here is to make sure that we don't have any corner
cases that begin to break bec
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:57 PM Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:35:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > What exactly do you argue has changed since the previous decision
> > that should cause us to change it? In particular, where is the
> > additional data to change our minds ab
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:35:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What exactly do you argue has changed since the previous decision
> that should cause us to change it? In particular, where is the
> additional data to change our minds about the safety of such a thing?
Not sure that's safe, as we also w
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= writes:
> Attached patch adds the TOAST to pg_class, and let's open again the
> discussion around it.
What exactly do you argue has changed since the previous decision
that should cause us to change it? In particular, where is the
additional data to chang
Hi all,
I know it has been discussed before [1] but one of our customers complained
about something weird on one of their multi-tenancy databases (thousands of
schemas with a lot of objects inside and one user by schema).
So when I checked the problem is because the missing TOAST for pg_class,
an
