On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 16:38, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 14:55, Matthias van de Meent
> wrote:
> > Great idea, yet this patch seems to only freeze those tuples that are
> > located after the first to-be-frozen tuple. It should probably
> > re-visit earlier live tuples to potent
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 5:55 AM Simon Riggs
wrote:
> > I should be able to post something in a couple of weeks.
>
> How do you see that affecting this thread?
Well, it's clearly duplicative, at least in part. That in itself
doesn't mean much, but there are some general questions (that apply to
an
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 14:55, Matthias van de Meent
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 15:36, Simon Riggs
> wrote:
> >
> > Starting new thread with updated patch to avoid confusion, as
> > mentioned by David Steele on the original thread:
> > Original messageid: 20201118020418.GA13408@alvherre.pg
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 20:57, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:56 AM Matthias van de Meent
> wrote:
> > Great idea, yet this patch seems to only freeze those tuples that are
> > located after the first to-be-frozen tuple. It should probably
> > re-visit earlier live tuples to
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:56 AM Matthias van de Meent
wrote:
> Great idea, yet this patch seems to only freeze those tuples that are
> located after the first to-be-frozen tuple. It should probably
> re-visit earlier live tuples to potentially freeze those as well.
I have a big patch set pending
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 15:36, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> Starting new thread with updated patch to avoid confusion, as
> mentioned by David Steele on the original thread:
> Original messageid: 20201118020418.GA13408@alvherre.pgsql
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 02:04, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2020-Nov-
Starting new thread with updated patch to avoid confusion, as
mentioned by David Steele on the original thread:
Original messageid: 20201118020418.GA13408@alvherre.pgsql
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 02:04, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Nov-17, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > As an additional optimization, if
