Re: Mark unconditionally-safe implicit coercions as leakproof

2020-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:17 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> I went through the system's built-in implicit coercions to see >> which ones are unconditionally successful. These could all be >> marked leakproof, as per attached patch. > IMHO, this is a nice improvement. Thanks; push

Re: Mark unconditionally-safe implicit coercions as leakproof

2020-07-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:17 PM Tom Lane wrote: > I went through the system's built-in implicit coercions to see > which ones are unconditionally successful. These could all be > marked leakproof, as per attached patch. This came up in the > context of the nearby discussion about CASE, but it s

Mark unconditionally-safe implicit coercions as leakproof

2020-07-24 Thread Tom Lane
I went through the system's built-in implicit coercions to see which ones are unconditionally successful. These could all be marked leakproof, as per attached patch. This came up in the context of the nearby discussion about CASE, but it seems like an independent improvement. If you have a funct