On 2021/10/21 17:40, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Masahiro Ikeda
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/10/20 18:17, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> If m
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>
> On 2021/10/20 18:17, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> >>> If my understanding is right, it's better to remove th
On 2021/10/20 18:17, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>>> If my understanding is right, it's better to remove them since they make
>>> users confused. Please see the attached patch.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> > If my understanding is right, it's better to remove them since they make
> > users confused. Please see the attached patch. I confirmed that to make
> > check-world passe
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> If my understanding is right, it's better to remove them since they make
> users confused. Please see the attached patch. I confirmed that to make
> check-world passes all tests.
Yeah, I don't see the point in keeping these events a
Hi,
When I read the documents and source code of wait evens,
I found that the following wait events are never reported.
* LogicalChangesRead: Waiting for a read from a logical changes file.
* LogicalChangesWrite: Waiting for a write to a logical changes file.
* LogicalSubxactRead: Waiting for a r
