On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:17 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:37 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:17 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> > > > Pushed.
> > >
> > > I think this was a good change, but there's at least one other problem
> > > here: within ReorderBufferRest
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:37 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:17 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> > > Pushed.
> >
> > I think this was a good change, but there's at least one other problem
> > here: within ReorderBufferRestoreChanges, the while (restored <
> > max_changes_in_memory && *se
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:17 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> > Pushed.
>
> I think this was a good change, but there's at least one other problem
> here: within ReorderBufferRestoreChanges, the while (restored <
> max_changes_in_memory && *segno <= last_segno) doesn't seem to contain
> a CFI. Note tha
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 4:40 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 4:48 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:37 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> > > I've attached patches for all supported branches.
> >
> > LGTM. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are comments/suggesti
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 4:48 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:37 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > I've attached patches for all supported branches.
> >
>
> LGTM. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are comments/suggestions.
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:37 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> I've attached patches for all supported branches.
>
LGTM. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are comments/suggestions.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:32 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:31 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:56 AM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:08 PM Amit Kapila
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:28 A
> On 16 Aug 2022, at 10:25, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> The same issue is recently reported[1] on -bugs
Oh, I missed that thread.
> and I proposed the
> patch that adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to the loop in
> ReorderBufferProcessTXN().
I agree that it's a good place for check.
> I think it sh
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:31 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:56 AM Masahiko Sawada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:08 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:28 AM Andrey Borodin
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi hackers!
> > > >
> > > > Some
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:56 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:08 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:28 AM Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi hackers!
> > >
> > > Some time ago I've seen a hanging logical replication that was trying to
> > > send tr
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:08 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:28 AM Andrey Borodin wrote:
> >
> > Hi hackers!
> >
> > Some time ago I've seen a hanging logical replication that was trying to
> > send transaction commit after doing table pg_repack.
> > I understand that those t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:28 AM Andrey Borodin wrote:
>
> Hi hackers!
>
> Some time ago I've seen a hanging logical replication that was trying to send
> transaction commit after doing table pg_repack.
> I understand that those things do not mix well. Yet walsender was ignoring
> pg_terminate_ba
Hi hackers!
Some time ago I've seen a hanging logical replication that was trying to send
transaction commit after doing table pg_repack.
I understand that those things do not mix well. Yet walsender was ignoring
pg_terminate_backend() and I think this worth fixing.
Can we add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUP
13 matches
Mail list logo