Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix

2024-11-18 Thread Jim Jones
Hi Greg On 11.07.24 18:09, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Thanks for the review. Please find attached a new version with proper > tabs and indenting. > > Cheers, > Greg > I'm testing this new log prefix and I'm wondering whether the following behaviour is expected. The value of '%L' is different in

Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix

2024-07-11 Thread David Steele
On 7/11/24 23:09, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Thanks for the review. Please find attached a new version with proper tabs and indenting. This looks good to me now. +1 overall for the feature. Regards, -David

Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix

2024-07-11 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
Thanks for the review. Please find attached a new version with proper tabs and indenting. Cheers, Greg 0002-Add-local-address-to-log_line_prefix.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix

2024-07-08 Thread David Steele
On 5/24/24 22:33, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Peter, thank you for the feedback. Attached is a new patch with "address" rather than "interface", plus a new default of "local" if there is no address. I also removed the questionable comment, and updated the commitfest title. I tried the updated

Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix

2024-05-24 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
Peter, thank you for the feedback. Attached is a new patch with "address" rather than "interface", plus a new default of "local" if there is no address. I also removed the questionable comment, and updated the commitfest title. Cheers, Greg From bfa69fc2fffcb29dee0c6acfa4fc3749f987b272 Mon Sep 17