On 01.05.24 19:04, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
Thank you for taking the time to review this. I've attached a new
rebased version, which has no significant changes.
There is a comment in the patch that states:
/* We do not need clean_ipv6_addr here: just report verbatim */
I am not
On 06.03.24 16:59, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
Someone on -general was asking about this, as they are listening on
multiple IPs and would like to know which exact one clients were
hitting. I took a quick look and we already have that information, so I
grabbed some stuff from inet_server_addr and
Thank you for taking the time to review this. I've attached a new rebased
version, which has no significant changes.
> There is a comment in the patch that states:
>
> /* We do not need clean_ipv6_addr here: just report verbatim */
>
> I am not quite sure what it means, but I am guessing it means
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:tested, passed
Hi
I did a quick test on this patch and it seems to work as
Someone on -general was asking about this, as they are listening on
multiple IPs and would like to know which exact one clients were hitting. I
took a quick look and we already have that information, so I grabbed some
stuff from inet_server_addr and added it as part of a "%L" (for 'local
interface'
