On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Yes, you have that right. Per dumptuples(), even the zero tuple run edge
> case will still write a run marker, and will therefore still consume a tape.
> We must have at least two initial runs to merge. (though dummy runs for non
> final me
Yes, you have that right. Per dumptuples(), even the zero tuple run edge
case will still write a run marker, and will therefore still consume a
tape. We must have at least two initial runs to merge. (though dummy runs
for non final merges are a slightly different matter.)
--
Peter Geoghegan
(Sent
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> While reviewing the parallel CREATE INDEX patch, I noticed that commit
> 8b304b8b omitted to remove a comment that it made obsolete.
>
> Attached patch removes the comment.
I had to think about this for a while. I could see that the commen
While reviewing the parallel CREATE INDEX patch, I noticed that commit
8b304b8b omitted to remove a comment that it made obsolete.
Attached patch removes the comment.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From a52ca388cb21f797bcfe3a1b15cc9168e5d26f41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date: Fri, 8 Dec
