Hi,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 04:13:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 05:12:05PM +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 17:01, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >> While reading code around I just noticed that I failed to adapt a comment a
> >> couple of lin
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 05:12:05PM +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 17:01, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> While reading code around I just noticed that I failed to adapt a comment a
>> couple of lines above a removed line in 0f61727b75b9. Patch attached.
>
> +1, seems OK to
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 17:01, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While reading code around I just noticed that I failed to adapt a comment a
> couple of lines above a removed line in 0f61727b75b9. Patch attached.
+1, seems OK to me.
Hi,
While reading code around I just noticed that I failed to adapt a comment a
couple of lines above a removed line in 0f61727b75b9. Patch attached.
>From 5ba34dd1129cd1e2038ac70992a6b5e77df6121e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 23:55:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH
