On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:22 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:48:24PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:57 AM Robert Haas
wrote:
> >> It would be pretty silly to have one and not the other, regardless of
> >> whether we can think of an imm
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:48:24PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:57 AM Robert Haas wrote:
>> It would be pretty silly to have one and not the other, regardless of
>> whether we can think of an immediate use case.
>
> +1
OK, applied with a catalog version bump.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 5:17 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:31:49AM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > New version attached.
>
> This looks in pretty good shape to me, and no objections from me to
> get those functions as the min() flavor is useful for monitoring WA
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:57 AM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:17 AM Michael Paquier
wrote:
> > Do you have a particular use-case in mind for max() one? I can think
> > of at least one case: monitoring the flush LSNs of a set of standbys
> > to find out how much has been replaye
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:17 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> Do you have a particular use-case in mind for max() one? I can think
> of at least one case: monitoring the flush LSNs of a set of standbys
> to find out how much has been replayed at most.
It would be pretty silly to have one and not the o
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:31:49AM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> New version attached.
This looks in pretty good shape to me, and no objections from me to
get those functions as the min() flavor is useful for monitoring WAL
retention for complex deployments.
Do you have a particular use
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 7:22 AM Surafel Temesgen
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Here are same review comment
Thanks for your review.
> - any numeric, string, date/time, network, or enum type,
> + any numeric, string, date/time, network, lsn, or enum type,
> or arrays of these types
>
Hi,
Here are same review comment
- any numeric, string, date/time, network, or enum type,
+ any numeric, string, date/time, network, lsn, or enum type,
or arrays of these types
same as argument type
In the documentation it refereed as pg_lsn type rather than lsn alone
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:27 PM Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:49:57PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > So attached patch aims to introduce MIN/MAX aggregate functions to
pg_lsn
>
> Fine by me. This looks helpful for monitoring.
>
> Plea
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:49:57PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> So attached patch aims to introduce MIN/MAX aggregate functions to pg_lsn
Fine by me. This looks helpful for monitoring.
Please make sure to register it to the next commit fest:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/
/MAX aggregate functions to pg_lsn
datatype.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
index 1a01473..490f3a8 100644
--- a
11 matches
Mail list logo
