On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 07:36:38PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:14 PM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:35:02PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM James Coleman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
>
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:14 PM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:35:02PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM James Coleman wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM James Colem
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:35:02PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM James Coleman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM James Coleman wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
On 5/7/20 5:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 03:58:47PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
>> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Jonathan S. Katz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> With Beta 1 just around the corner[1], I wanted to check in to see if
>>> this was closer to being committed so w
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 03:58:47PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
...
With Beta 1 just around the corner[1], I wanted to check in to see if
this was closer to being committed so we could close off the open
item[2] prior the beta release.
Th
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
> On 4/24/20 6:57 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:35:02PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM James Coleman wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
> >>>
On 4/24/20 6:57 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:35:02PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM James Coleman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM James Coleman
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:35:02PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM James Coleman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM James Coleman wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM James Coleman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM James Coleman wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 AM Michael Paquier
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > When initial
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM James Coleman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM James Coleman wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When initializing an incremental sort node, we have the following as
> > > of ExecInitIncremen
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM James Coleman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > When initializing an incremental sort node, we have the following as
> > of ExecInitIncrementalSort():
> > /*
> > * Incremental sort can't be used with eit
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When initializing an incremental sort node, we have the following as
> of ExecInitIncrementalSort():
> /*
> * Incremental sort can't be used with either EXEC_FLAG_REWIND,
> * EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD or EXEC_FLAG_MARK, beca
Hi,
When initializing an incremental sort node, we have the following as
of ExecInitIncrementalSort():
/*
* Incremental sort can't be used with either EXEC_FLAG_REWIND,
* EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD or EXEC_FLAG_MARK, because we only one of many sort
* batches in the current sort state.
13 matches
Mail list logo