On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:12:55PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> On 11/20/24 10:08 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Yes, or for MacOS.
>
> Well, why did EDB remove them? We didn't issue any guidance to remove
> downloads. We only provided guidance to users on decision making about
> whether to wait or
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 09:51:09PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> On 11/20/24 9:50 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> > On 11/20/24 9:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:18 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > so when we decided to remove the download
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 07:40:36PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:18 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> so when we decided to remove the downloads
>
>
> Can you elaborate on who "we" is here?
>
> I don't recall this event happening.
Uh, I only see 17.0 available for
On 11/20/24 10:08 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 09:51:09PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote:
On 11/20/24 9:50 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
On 11/20/24 9:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"David G. Johnston" writes:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:18 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
so when we decided to
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 09:49:27PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> That said, while it's certainly advisable to upgrade based on having CVEs in
> a release, many upgrade patterns are determined by the CVE score[2]. For
> example, a HIGH score (7.0 - 8.9 - our highest for this release was 8.8; 3
> of
On 11/20/24 9:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"David G. Johnston" writes:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:18 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
so when we decided to remove the downloads
Can you elaborate on who "we" is here?
More to the point, what downloads were removed? I still see the
source tarballs in the
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:18 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> so when we decided to remove the downloads
Can you elaborate on who "we" is here?
I don't recall this event happening.
I suppose "encouraging people to wait" is arguably a bad position to take
compared to directing them to a page on our w
On 11/20/24 9:50 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
On 11/20/24 9:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"David G. Johnston" writes:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:18 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
so when we decided to remove the downloads
Can you elaborate on who "we" is here?
More to the point, what downloads were rem
On 11/20/24 9:18 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 06:28:42PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote:
We're scheduling an out-of-cycle release on November 21, 2024 to address two
regressions that were released as part of the November 14, 2024 update
release[1]. As part of this release, we wil
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:18 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> so when we decided to remove the downloads
> Can you elaborate on who "we" is here?
More to the point, what downloads were removed? I still see the
source tarballs in the usual place [1]. If some packager(s)
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 06:28:42PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> We're scheduling an out-of-cycle release on November 21, 2024 to address two
> regressions that were released as part of the November 14, 2024 update
> release[1]. As part of this release, we will issue fixes for all supported
> versi
We're scheduling an out-of-cycle release on November 21, 2024 to address
two regressions that were released as part of the November 14, 2024
update release[1]. As part of this release, we will issue fixes for all
supported versions (17.2, 16.6, 15.10, 14.15, 13.20), and for 12.22,
even though P
12 matches
Mail list logo
