Jesse Zhang writes:
> I didn't make my question clear though: I'm curious what motivated the
> original addition of -Wno-unused-command-line-argument in commit
> 73b416b2e412, and how that problem did't quite manifest itself with Clang++.
We didn't then have the convention of mentioning relevant
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:29 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Jesse Zhang writes:
> > either way: either changing the macro names or changing the comment. PFA
> > a patch that keeps the macro names.
>
> Pushed, thanks.
>
Thanks!
> > Also in hindsight: it seems that, as suggested in the trailer typo,
> >
Jesse Zhang writes:
> While poking at the build system I stumbled upon some trivial trailer
> comment inconsistencies in config/c-compiler.m4. They can be fixed
> either way: either changing the macro names or changing the comment. PFA
> a patch that keeps the macro names.
Pushed, thanks.
> In h
Hi hackers,
While poking at the build system I stumbled upon some trivial trailer
comment inconsistencies in config/c-compiler.m4. They can be fixed
either way: either changing the macro names or changing the comment. PFA
a patch that keeps the macro names.
In hindsight though, it seems that PGAC
