Hi,
On 2023-02-19 11:13:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
> > On 2023-02-19 Su 02:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> On 18.02.23 21:26, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> My inclination is to move TEMP_CONFIG support from the Makefile to
> >>> pg_regress.c. That way it's consistent across
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 2023-02-19 Su 02:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 18.02.23 21:26, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> My inclination is to move TEMP_CONFIG support from the Makefile to
>>> pg_regress.c. That way it's consistent across the build tools and isn't
>>> duplicated.
>> I'm having a ha
On 2023-02-19 Su 02:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 18.02.23 21:26, Andres Freund wrote:
When building with meson, TEMP_CONFIG is supported for TAP tests, but
doesn't
do anything for regress/isolation.
The reason for that is that meson's (and ninja's) architecture is to
separate
"build setup"
On 18.02.23 21:26, Andres Freund wrote:
When building with meson, TEMP_CONFIG is supported for TAP tests, but doesn't
do anything for regress/isolation.
The reason for that is that meson's (and ninja's) architecture is to separate
"build setup" from the "build/test/whatever" stage, moving dynami
Hi,
When building with meson, TEMP_CONFIG is supported for TAP tests, but doesn't
do anything for regress/isolation.
The reason for that is that meson's (and ninja's) architecture is to separate
"build setup" from the "build/test/whatever" stage, moving dynamism (and more
costly operations) to th
