Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Gilles Darold
Le 17/01/2025 à 19:01, Bruce Momjian a écrit : On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal: So this feature would be like global GUC variables, with permission control? + types and domain type check - holds da

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Marcos Pegoraro
Em sex., 17 de jan. de 2025 às 13:01, Bruce Momjian escreveu: > Okay, good summary. Now, can people give feedback that they would want > this committed to PostgreSQL? I would love to have this functionality as soon as possible. I already mentioned to Pavel that he did something very big, and c

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Marcos Pegoraro
> > > pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian > napsal: > > Okay, good summary. Now, can people give feedback that they would want > this committed to PostgreSQL? > I would love to have this functionality as soon as possible. I already mentioned to Pavel that he did something very big, a

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Wolfgang Walther
Bruce Momjian: Now, can people give feedback that they would want this committed to PostgreSQL? From a user's perspective: Yes! I've been waiting for this for a long time and I really hope this can go through, eventually. Best, Wolfgang

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Dmitry Dolgov
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 11:01:41AM GMT, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal: > > > > So this feature would be like global GUC variables, with permission > > control? > > > > + typ

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 11:01 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal: > > > > So this feature would be like global GUC variables, with permission > > control? > > > > + types an

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Julien Rouhaud
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 11:01:41AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal: > > > > So this feature would be like global GUC variables, with permission > > control? > > > > + t

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal: > > So this feature would be like global GUC variables, with permission > control? > > + types and domain type check - holds data in binary form - there are not > conv

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Pavel Stehule
pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:32:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > This discussion was around 2017 when I wrote a proposal and I hadn't a > feeling > > 2017 is seven years ago so it would be good to get current feedback on > the desirabili

Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:32:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > This discussion was around 2017 when I wrote a proposal and I hadn't a feeling 2017 is seven years ago so it would be good to get current feedback on the desirability of this feature. > There is one stronger argument for session var

Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables

2025-01-17 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hi pá 17. 1. 2025 v 15:39 odesílatel Bruce Momjian napsal: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 03:28:55PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Dne pá 17. 1. 2025 15:16 uživatel Bruce Momjian > napsal: > > Is this really something we are considering applying, since it has > been > > around for years?