Greetings,
* Christoph Berg (m...@debian.org) wrote:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
I'd further say "folks are interested in an alternative to OpenSSL" as
being a generally good
Greetings,
* Felix Lechner (felix.lech...@lease-up.com) wrote:
> Attached please find a WIP patch for wolfSSL support in postgresql-12.
Would really be best to have this off of HEAD if we're going to be
looking at it rather than v12. We certainly aren't going to add new
support for something new
Hi Jonah,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 12:35 PM Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>
> Somewhere, I recall seeing an open-source OpenSSL compatibility wrapper for
> WolfSSL. Assuming that still exists, this patch seems entirely unnecessary.
The patch uses the OpenSSL compatibility layer.
Kind regards
Felix Lec
Hi Tom,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:52 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The configure
> script could add -I/usr/include/wolfssl (or wherever those files
> are) to CPPFLAGS instead of touching all those #includes.
That does not work well when OpenSSL's development files are
installed. I did not think a segm
Hi Tom,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 7:56 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> However, judging from the caveats mentioned in the initial message,
> my inclination would be to wait awhile for wolfSSL to mature.
Please have a closer look. The library has been around since 2004 and
is popular in embedded systems. (I
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 10:18:12AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We have added support for allegedly-OpenSSL compatible libraries such as
> LibreSSL before, so some tweaks for wolfSSL would seem acceptable. However,
> I doubt we are going to backpatch them, so unless you want to take
> responsib
Felix Lechner writes:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 7:56 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, judging from the caveats mentioned in the initial message,
>> my inclination would be to wait awhile for wolfSSL to mature.
> Please have a closer look. The library has been around since 2004 and
> is popular in
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 10:18:12AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-06-27 14:50, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
> >
> > Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
>
> We have added support for
On 2020-06-27 14:50, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Peter Eisentraut
What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
We have added support for allegedly-OpenSSL compatible libraries such as
LibreSSL before, so some tweaks for
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 05:46:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:25:21PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >> Personally, the dynamic link does not hurt the GPL.
> >> But some people, do not think so, it was also unclear what Mr Stallman
> >> thinks
> >
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:25:21PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Personally, the dynamic link does not hurt the GPL.
>> But some people, do not think so, it was also unclear what Mr Stallman thinks
>> of the subject (dynamic link).
> I think Stallman says the courts have
Christoph Berg writes:
> Re: Ranier Vilela
>> Isn't LIbreSSL a better alternative?
> I don't know.
It should work all right --- it's the default ssl library on OpenBSD
and some other platforms, so we have some buildfarm coverage for it.
(AFAICT, none of the OpenBSD machines are running the ssl t
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:25:21PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Personally, the dynamic link does not hurt the GPL.
> But some people, do not think so, it was also unclear what Mr Stallman thinks
> of the subject (dynamic link).
I think Stallman says the courts have to decide, which kind of makes
Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 18:23, Bruce Momjian
escreveu:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:14:21PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 16:40, Bruce Momjian
> > escreveu:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:22:51PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > > Em sáb., 27 de
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:37 PM Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Jonah H. Harris
> > Somewhere, I recall seeing an open-source OpenSSL compatibility wrapper
> for
> > WolfSSL. Assuming that still exists, this patch seems entirely
> unnecessary.
>
> Unless you actually tried.
Did you? It worked for m
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:14:21PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 16:40, Bruce Momjian
> escreveu:
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:22:51PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg
> > escreveu:
> >
> >
Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 16:40, Bruce Momjian
escreveu:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:22:51PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg
> > escreveu:
> >
> > Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenS
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:22:51PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg
> escreveu:
>
> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
>
Re: Ranier Vilela
> I'm curious, how do you intend to solve a linking problem with
> OpenSSL-vs-GPL-readline, with another GPL product?
> WolfSSL, will provide a commercial license for PostgreSQL?
It's replacing OpenSSL+GPL with GPL+GPL.
> Isn't LIbreSSL a better alternative?
I don't know.
Chri
Re: Jonah H. Harris
> Somewhere, I recall seeing an open-source OpenSSL compatibility wrapper for
> WolfSSL. Assuming that still exists, this patch seems entirely unnecessary.
Unless you actually tried.
Christoph
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:25 PM Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg
> escreveu:
>
>> Re: Peter Eisentraut
>> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>>
>> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
>>
> I'm curious, how
Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg
escreveu:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
>
I'm curious, how do you intend to solve a linking problem with
OpenSSL-vs-GPL-readl
Christoph Berg writes:
> It's a WIP patch, meant to see if it works at all. Of course OpenSSL
> would stay as the default option.
Fair enough. One thing that struck me as I looked at it was that
most of the #include hackery seemed unnecessary. The configure
script could add -I/usr/include/wolfs
Re: Tom Lane
> In any case, the patch as written seems to *remove* the option
> to compile PG with OpenSSL.
It's a WIP patch, meant to see if it works at all. Of course OpenSSL
would stay as the default option.
Christoph
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:16:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Also, wolfSSL is developed by a company and dual GPL/commerical
> > licenses, so it seems like a mismatch to me.
>
> Yeah, that's definitely a factor behind my disinterest in
> making wolfSSL be the only alterna
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Also, wolfSSL is developed by a company and dual GPL/commerical
> licenses, so it seems like a mismatch to me.
Yeah, that's definitely a factor behind my disinterest in
making wolfSSL be the only alternative. However, as long as
it's available on GPL terms, I don't see a
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:56:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 02:50:27PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> >> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> >>> What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> >> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 02:50:27PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> Re: Peter Eisentraut
>>> What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
> Uh, wolfSSL is GPL2:
> https://www.wolfssl.com/lice
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 02:50:27PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
Uh, wolfSSL is GPL2:
https://www.wolfssl.com/license/
Not sure why we woul
Re: Peter Eisentraut
> What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
Christoph
On 2020-06-27 00:33, Felix Lechner wrote:
Is anyone here interested in helping to evaluate an experimental patch
for wolfSSL support?
What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Re
Hi,
Is anyone here interested in helping to evaluate an experimental patch
for wolfSSL support?
Attached please find a WIP patch for wolfSSL support in postgresql-12.
As a shortcut, you may find this merge request helpful:
https://salsa.debian.org/postgresql/postgresql/-/merge_requests/4
I
32 matches
Mail list logo
