Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-14 Thread Rustam ALLAKOV
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: tested, passed Documentation:tested, passed Hi Paul, Thank you for your prompt reply. > I have the same

Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-11 Thread Paul Jungwirth
On 7/11/25 11:50, Rustam ALLAKOV wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks for this patch! Lilian and I have reviewed your patches. Thank you for the review! I've attached new patches addressing your feedback. All patches apply and all tests are passing. Since you are adding tests, we expected to see some impro

Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-11 Thread Rustam ALLAKOV
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: tested, passed Documentation:tested, passed Hi Paul, Thanks for this patch! Lilian and I have reviewed yo

Foreign key isolation tests

2025-05-16 Thread Paul A Jungwirth
Here are a couple new isolation tests for foreign keys, based on feedback from the Advanced Patch Review session at PGConf.dev. The goal is to show that temporal foreign keys do not violate referential integrity under concurrency. Non-temporal foreign keys use a crosscheck snapshot to avoid this.