On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 03:37:33PM +0800, Japin Li wrote:
> Thanks for you confirmation! Please consider the v2 patch to review.
This oversight is from me via commit e35cc3b3f2d0. I'll take care of
it. Thanks for the report!
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 15:22, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 07:18, Chen Hao Hsu wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> pgbench mixes int and int64 to initialize the tables.
>>> When a large enough scale factor is passed, initPopulateTable
>>> overflows leading to it never completi
>
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 07:18, Chen Hao Hsu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> pgbench mixes int and int64 to initialize the tables.
>> When a large enough scale factor is passed, initPopulateTable
>> overflows leading to it never completing, ie.
>>
>> 214740 of 22 tuples (97%) of
>> pgbenc
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 07:18, Chen Hao Hsu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pgbench mixes int and int64 to initialize the tables.
> When a large enough scale factor is passed, initPopulateTable
> overflows leading to it never completing, ie.
>
> 214740 of 22 tuples (97%) of
> pgbench_accounts don
Hello,
pgbench mixes int and int64 to initialize the tables.
When a large enough scale factor is passed, initPopulateTable
overflows leading to it never completing, ie.
214740 of 22 tuples (97%) of
pgbench_accounts done (elapsed 4038.83 s, remaining 98.93 s)
-214740 of 22
