On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 08:24:01AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> 6.10. fildes -> fd
Not sure that this one was worth bothering.
And the rest looks correct after review, so applied! Thanks!
> As a side note, while looking at dt_common.c (fixing 6.47), I've got a
> feeling that the datetktbl i
Hello hackers,
Please consider fixing the next batch of typos and inconsistencies in
the tree:
6.1. FADVISE_WILLNEED -> POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED
6.2. failOK -> missing_ok
6.3. failOnerror -> failOnSignal
6.4. fakebits -> remove (irrelevant since introduction in 945543d9)
6.5. FastPathGetLockEntry -> Fa
