Great, thanks!
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 6:24 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2019-May-27, Jan Chochol wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > When investigating behavior of "DISCARD ALL", I found that order of
> > steps of equivalent sequence in documentation is not updated with
> > changes in code.
>
> Pushe
On 2019-May-27, Jan Chochol wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When investigating behavior of "DISCARD ALL", I found that order of
> steps of equivalent sequence in documentation is not updated with
> changes in code.
Pushed. I noticed that DISCARD TEMP and DISCARD SEQUENCES appeared in
the opposite order, to
p 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Chochol
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 09:26:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix order of steps in DISCARD ALL documentation
Since a874fe7b4c890d1fe3455215a83ca777867beadd portals are closed at
beggining of "DISCARD ALL" sequence.
This fix corrects documentation,
