On 2020-02-20 17:24, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Jos=C3=A9_Santamar=C3=ADa_Flecha?=
writes:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:52 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Anyway, I'll have a go at updating gaur to use 4.5.x. There is a
sane-looking stdint.h on my second-oldest dinosaur, prairiedog.
Don't know about th
=?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Jos=C3=A9_Santamar=C3=ADa_Flecha?=
writes:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:52 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Anyway, I'll have a go at updating gaur to use 4.5.x. There is a
>> sane-looking stdint.h on my second-oldest dinosaur, prairiedog.
>> Don't know about the situation on Windows, though
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:52 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'll have a go at updating gaur to use 4.5.x. There is a
> sane-looking stdint.h on my second-oldest dinosaur, prairiedog.
> Don't know about the situation on Windows, though. We might want
> to take a close look at NetBSD, too, based
I wrote:
> Ooops. Poking around, it looks like this version of gcc has brought its
> own stdbool.h, but not stdint.h:
> ...
> Kind of annoying. Perhaps more recent gcc versions fixed that?
Here we go, in the gcc 4.5.x release notes:
GCC now ensures that a C99-conforming is present on most
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2020-02-14 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW: I'm still concerned about the possibility of the C library being
>> less than C99. The model that was popular back then, and which still
>> exists on e.g. gaur, was that you could install a C99 *compiler* on
>> a pre-C99 syst
On 2020-02-14 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, I think that the C99 requirement has obsoleted a number of configure
tests and related hackery in c.h. We just haven't got round to cleaning
that up yet.
BTW: I'm still concerned about the possibility of the C library being
less than C99. The model th
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2020-02-13 16:19, Tom Lane wrote:
>> According to C99 and POSIX, intptr_t should be provided by ...
>> now that we're requiring C99, can we get away with just #include'ing
>> that directly in these test files?
> I think in the past we were worried about the C librar
On 2020-02-13 16:19, Tom Lane wrote:
According to C99 and POSIX, intptr_t should be provided by ...
now that we're requiring C99, can we get away with just #include'ing
that directly in these test files?
I think in the past we were worried about the C library not being fully
C99. But the bui
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> GCC reports various instances of
> warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
> [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
> warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
> [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> in ECPG test files. This is because void* and long are
adfcbc45cbe968d1a1230bce7a2891e75038d84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:02:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix compiler warnings on 64-bit Windows
GCC reports various instances of
warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
wa
10 matches
Mail list logo
