On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:38 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you share some numbers about how not well it perform and how many
> hardware transactions were aborted with a fallback? I'm curious because
> from this paper [1] I've got an impression that the bigger (in terms of
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:55:12PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> Here's a *highly* experimental patch set that tries to skip the LWLock
> protocol in predicate.c and use HTM[1] instead. HTM is itself a sort
> of hardware-level implementation of SSI for shared memory. My
> thin
Hello hackers,
Here's a *highly* experimental patch set that tries to skip the LWLock
protocol in predicate.c and use HTM[1] instead. HTM is itself a sort
of hardware-level implementation of SSI for shared memory. My
thinking was that if your workload already suits the optimistic nature
of SSI,
