Dear David,
> And they will see empty strings (or blanks or whatever the defaults are) for
> everything except LSN, like they always do, and not realize or care that our
> code
> generated file actually contained lines for them. (I haven't actually
> experimented
> here though.)
It is OK for me
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:20 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> With all the recent work on pg_createsubscriber I decided to take a look at
> it, namely the documentation.
>
I agree this page needs some improvement. Thanks for taking up this task.
> The 0001 patch is basically just fixing
Thank you for the quick reply.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 7:56 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <
kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> > The main thing I noted is that our synopsis is simply wrong regarding the
> > optionality of the --database option. I went with a fix that included
> onl
Dear David,
> The main thing I noted is that our synopsis is simply wrong regarding the
> optionality of the --database option. I went with a fix that included only
> showing the two mandatory options and adding a paragraph to usage explaining
> that --database exists and how to use it. Our exis
Hi.
With all the recent work on pg_createsubscriber I decided to take a look at
it, namely the documentation.
The 0001 patch is basically just fixing some typos and other minor edits.
The 0002 includes some of the more editoralized (but still limited) changes.
The main thing I noted is that our
