> On 25 Mar 2022, at 13:59, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>
>>> On 24 Mar 2022, at 19:34, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> I just spotted an unnecessarily gendered example involving a 'salesmen'
>>> table in the UPDATE docs. Here's a patch that chang
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 24 Mar 2022, at 19:34, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>
>> I just spotted an unnecessarily gendered example involving a 'salesmen'
>> table in the UPDATE docs. Here's a patch that changes that to
>> 'salespeople'.
>
> No objections to changing that, it's AFAICT t
> On 24 Mar 2022, at 19:34, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> I just spotted an unnecessarily gendered example involving a 'salesmen'
> table in the UPDATE docs. Here's a patch that changes that to
> 'salespeople'.
No objections to changing that, it's AFAICT the sole such usage in the docs.
>
Hi Hackers,
I just spotted an unnecessarily gendered example involving a 'salesmen'
table in the UPDATE docs. Here's a patch that changes that to
'salespeople'.
- ilmari
>From fde378ccd44c15f827a3c22630265f477d70d748 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Dagfinn=20Ilmari=20Manns=C3=A5ker?=
D
