On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:16:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:39:55PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:27 PM Japin Li wrote:
> >
> >
> > +0.90
> >
> > Consider changing:
> >
> > "makes any base backups taken before this unusable"
> >
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:39:55PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:27 PM Japin Li wrote:
> >
> >
> > +0.90
> >
> > Consider changing:
> >
> > "makes any base backups taken before this unusable"
> >
> > to:
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:39:55PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:27 PM Japin Li wrote:
>
>
> +0.90
>
> Consider changing:
>
> "makes any base backups taken before this unusable"
>
> to:
>
> "makes existing base backups unusable"
>
> As I try to justify this, th
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:27 PM Japin Li wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 03:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:29:20PM +0800, Japin Li wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 08:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 08:02:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 03:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:29:20PM +0800, Japin Li wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 08:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 08:02:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> "Precondition" is an overly fancy word that makes things
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:29:20PM +0800, Japin Li wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 08:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 08:02:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> "Precondition" is an overly fancy word that makes things less clear
> >> not more so. Does it mean that setting wal_
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 6:27 AM Japin Li wrote:
>
> >
> > +servers. If setting max_wal_senders to
> > +0 consider also reducing the amount of WAL
> produced
> > +by changing wal_level to
> minimal.
> >
> > I don't think this is great advice. It will encourage people to u
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 08:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 08:02:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Precondition" is an overly fancy word that makes things less clear
>> not more so. Does it mean that setting wal_level = minimal will fail
>> if you don't do these other things, or
Sorry for the late reply.
On Wed, 06 Jul 2022 at 08:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Japin Li writes:
>> [ v4-wal-level-documentation.patch ]
>
> Hm, I don't care for the wording here:
>
> +A precondition for using minimal WAL is to disable WAL archiving and
> +streaming replication by se
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 08:02:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Precondition" is an overly fancy word that makes things less clear
> not more so. Does it mean that setting wal_level = minimal will fail
> if you don't do these other things, or does it just mean that you
> won't be getting the absolute
Japin Li writes:
> [ v4-wal-level-documentation.patch ]
Hm, I don't care for the wording here:
+A precondition for using minimal WAL is to disable WAL archiving and
+streaming replication by setting archive_mode to
+off, and to
+0.
"Precondition" is an overly fa
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 2:49 AM Japin Li wrote:
> Thanks for your review. Modified.
>
Works for me. I have some additional sparks of ideas but nothing that need
hold this up.
David J.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:05 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
> But,
> anyway, IMHO, it is mere a performance tips that is not necessarily
> required in this section, or even in this documentaiotn. Addtion to
> that, if we write this for max_wal_senders, archive_mode will deserve
> the similar tips b
On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 at 14:05, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Fri, 04 Mar 2022 12:18:29 +0800, Japin Li wrote in
>>
>> On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 at 12:10, Japin Li wrote:
>>
>> Attach v3 patch to fix missing close varname tag.
>
> +A precondition for using minimal WAL is to disable WAL archiv
At Fri, 04 Mar 2022 12:18:29 +0800, Japin Li wrote in
>
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 at 12:10, Japin Li wrote:
>
> Attach v3 patch to fix missing close varname tag.
+A precondition for using minimal WAL is to disable WAL archiving and
+streaming replication by setting
+to 0,
On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 at 12:10, Japin Li wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 at 11:25, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>> I would suggest a wording more like:
>>
>> "A precondition for using minimal WAL is to disable WAL archiving and
>> streaming replication by setting max_wal_senders to 0, and archive_mode
On Thu, 03 Mar 2022 at 11:25, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> I would suggest a wording more like:
>
> "A precondition for using minimal WAL is to disable WAL archiving and
> streaming replication by setting max_wal_senders to 0, and archive_mode to
> off."
>
> While accurate, the phrase "you must se
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:44 PM Japin Li wrote:
>
> Hi, hackers
>
> When I try to change wal_level to minimal and restart the database, it
> complains
> max_wal_senders > 0.
>
> 2022-03-03 10:10:16.938 CST [6389] FATAL: WAL streaming (max_wal_senders
> > 0) requires wal_level "replica" or "logica
Hi, hackers
When I try to change wal_level to minimal and restart the database, it complains
max_wal_senders > 0.
2022-03-03 10:10:16.938 CST [6389] FATAL: WAL streaming (max_wal_senders > 0)
requires wal_level "replica" or "logical"
However, the documentation about wal_level [1] doesn't ment
19 matches
Mail list logo
