On 2024-06-13 17:01, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:24:10AM +, masahiro.ik...@nttdata.com
wrote:
Thanks for your response. Please take a look at the attached patch.
I've confirmed that it passes all tests.
Thanks for the patch. Will check and apply.
Thanks for applyin
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:24:10AM +, masahiro.ik...@nttdata.com wrote:
> Thanks for your response. Please take a look at the attached patch.
> I've confirmed that it passes all tests.
Thanks for the patch. Will check and apply.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>> While searching the definition of auxiliary processes, I noticed that
>> the description of the WAL summarizer is incorrect. Additionally, I
>> think it's better to add a description for the WAL writer similar to
>> other Auxiliary processes. What do you think?
>
> Good catch. Would you like to
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 06:06:11PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> While searching the definition of auxiliary processes, I noticed that the
> description of the WAL summarizer is incorrect. Additionally, I think it's
> better to add a description for the WAL writer similar to other Auxiliary
> proc
Hi,
While searching the definition of auxiliary processes, I noticed that
the
description of the WAL summarizer is incorrect. Additionally, I think
it's
better to add a description for the WAL writer similar to other
Auxiliary
processes. What do you think?
# patch
```
diff --git a/doc/src/s
