Greetings,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost writes:
> > > Push, thanks again!
> >
> > Why'd you only change HEAD? Isn't the test equally fragile in the
> > back branches?
>
> Following on from this after some additional cros
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost writes:
> > Push, thanks again!
>
> Why'd you only change HEAD? Isn't the test equally fragile in the
> back branches?
Back-patched.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost writes:
> > Push, thanks again!
>
> Why'd you only change HEAD? Isn't the test equally fragile in the
> back branches?
Following on from this after some additional cross-platform testing,
turns out there's other options we shoul
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost writes:
> > Push, thanks again!
>
> Why'd you only change HEAD? Isn't the test equally fragile in the
> back branches?
We hadn't had any complaints about it and so I wasn't sure if it was
useful to back-patch it. I'm happy to d
Stephen Frost writes:
> Push, thanks again!
Why'd you only change HEAD? Isn't the test equally fragile in the
back branches?
regards, tom lane
Greetings,
* Heikki Linnakangas (hlinn...@iki.fi) wrote:
> On 25 February 2023 00:50:30 EET, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >Thanks for reviewing! Comments added and updated the commit message.
> >
> >Unless there's anything else, I'll push this early next week.
>
> s/capture portal/captive portal/. Ot
On 25 February 2023 00:50:30 EET, Stephen Frost wrote:
>Thanks for reviewing! Comments added and updated the commit message.
>
>Unless there's anything else, I'll push this early next week.
s/capture portal/captive portal/. Other than that, looks good to me.
- Heikki
Greetings,
* Heikki Linnakangas (hlinn...@iki.fi) wrote:
> On 21/02/2023 01:35, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > The name canonicalization support for Kerberos is doing us more harm
> > than good in the regression tests, so I propose we disable it. Patch
> > attached.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Makes sense.
On 21/02/2023 01:35, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,
The name canonicalization support for Kerberos is doing us more harm
than good in the regression tests, so I propose we disable it. Patch
attached.
Thoughts?
Makes sense. A brief comment in 001_auth.pl itself to mention why we
disable rdn
Greetings,
The name canonicalization support for Kerberos is doing us more harm
than good in the regression tests, so I propose we disable it. Patch
attached.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Stephen
From 992d946d17c79d240ac6587998e2f94b12a726de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Frost
Date: Mon, 20 Feb
10 matches
Mail list logo