On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> The comment says why it checks both bounds and part_scheme, but it
> doesn't explain why we check nparts, part_rels etc. My patch had that
> explanation.
Hmm, well, I couldn't understand it from your comment. I'm fine with
adding more expl
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>> Here's patch taking that approach.
>
> I rewrote the comment in relation.h like this, which I think is more clear:
>
> /*
> * Is given relation partitioned?
> *
> - * A join betwee
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> Here's patch taking that approach.
I rewrote the comment in relation.h like this, which I think is more clear:
/*
* Is given relation partitioned?
*
- * A join between two partitioned relations with same partitioning scheme
- * without
Hi,
I noticed a crash in partition-wise involving dummy partitioned
tables. Here's simple testcase
CREATE TABLE prt1 (a int, b int, c varchar) PARTITION BY RANGE(a);
CREATE TABLE prt1_p1 PARTITION OF prt1 FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (250);
CREATE TABLE prt1_p3 PARTITION OF prt1 FOR VALUES FROM (500) TO
