Richard Guo writes:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:51 PM David Rowley wrote:
>> There's some relevant discussion in
>> https://postgr.es/m/flat/20220602024243.GJ29853%40telsasoft.com
> It seems that the controversial '-Og' coupled with the old GCC version
> (4.8) makes it not worth fixing. So pleas
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:51 PM David Rowley wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 19:14, Richard Guo wrote:
> > I came across the following compiling warnings on GCC (Red Hat 4.8.5-44)
> > 4.8.5 with 'CFLAGS=-Og'
>
> > I wonder if this is worth fixing, maybe by a trivial patch like
> > attached.
>
> Th
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 19:14, Richard Guo wrote:
> I came across the following compiling warnings on GCC (Red Hat 4.8.5-44)
> 4.8.5 with 'CFLAGS=-Og'
> I wonder if this is worth fixing, maybe by a trivial patch like
> attached.
There's some relevant discussion in
https://postgr.es/m/flat/20220602
I came across the following compiling warnings on GCC (Red Hat 4.8.5-44)
4.8.5 with 'CFLAGS=-Og'
be-fsstubs.c: In function ‘be_lo_export’:
be-fsstubs.c:537:24: warning: ‘fd’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (CloseTransientFile(fd) != 0)
