> On 7 Feb 2024, at 14:15, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2024-Feb-07, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> Since the CF app knows when the last email in the thread was, the
>> state of the patch entry and the number of CF's which is has been
>> present in; maybe we can extend the app to highlight these
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 6:07 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2024-Feb-04, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > We should do something about these kinds of entries, there were few
> > suggestions like tagging under a new category or so, can we add a new
> > status to park these entries something like "Waiting for
On 2024-Feb-07, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Since the CF app knows when the last email in the thread was, the
> state of the patch entry and the number of CF's which is has been
> present in; maybe we can extend the app to highlight these patches in
> a way which doesn't add more manual interventio
> On 7 Feb 2024, at 13:37, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Maybe a new status is appropriate ... I would suggest "Stalled". Such a
> patch still applies and has no pending feedback, but nobody seems
> interested.
Since the CF app knows when the last email in the thread was, the state of the
patch entry
On 2024-Feb-04, vignesh C wrote:
> We should do something about these kinds of entries, there were few
> suggestions like tagging under a new category or so, can we add a new
> status to park these entries something like "Waiting for direction".
> The threads which have no discussion for 6 months
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 6:51 AM vignesh C wrote:
> We should do something about these kinds of entries, there were few
> suggestions like tagging under a new category or so, can we add a new
> status to park these entries something like "Waiting for direction".
> The threads which have no discussio
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 14:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2024-Jan-10, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > > On 9 Jan 2024, at 23:18, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> > > I think we need to be more aggressive about marking things returned
> > > with feedback when they don't get updated.
> >
> > I very much ag
On 2024-Jan-10, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 9 Jan 2024, at 23:18, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > I think we need to be more aggressive about marking things returned
> > with feedback when they don't get updated.
>
> I very much agree. Having marked quite a lot of patches as RwF when being CFM
>
> On 9 Jan 2024, at 23:18, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think we need to be more aggressive about marking things returned
> with feedback when they don't get updated.
I very much agree. Having marked quite a lot of patches as RwF when being CFM
I can attest that it gets very little off-list pushback
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 03:48, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we need to be more aggressive about marking things returned
> with feedback when they don't get updated. If a patch is waiting for
> reviews for a long time, well, that's one thing. Maybe we eventually
> close it due to lack of i
Hi,
I think we need to be more aggressive about marking things returned
with feedback when they don't get updated. If a patch is waiting for
reviews for a long time, well, that's one thing. Maybe we eventually
close it due to lack of interest in reviewing it, but that should be
done cautiously, as
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 22:50, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 07:22, vignesh C wrote:
> > Here is a list of "Needs review" entries for which there has not been
> > much communication on the thread and needs help in proceeding further.
>
> Thank you for creating these lists. It's
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 07:22, vignesh C wrote:
> Here is a list of "Needs review" entries for which there has not been
> much communication on the thread and needs help in proceeding further.
Thank you for creating these lists. It's definitely helpful to see
what to focus my reviewing effort on. I
Hi,
Here's a quick status report after the first week:
Status summary:
Needs review: 238.
Waiting on Author: 44.
Ready for Committer: 27.
Committed: 36.
Moved to next CF: 1.
Withdrawn: 2.
Returned with Feedback: 3.
Rejected: 1.
Total: 352.
Here is a list of "Needs review" entries
14 matches
Mail list logo
