> On 3 Mar 2022, at 10:11, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> I think this patch set needs more reviews to be commitable in 15, so I
> returned the target version to blank. I'll change it to 16 later.
I've added 16 as a target version in the CF app now.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:39:45 -0500
Greg Stark wrote:
> As Justin suggested I CC the authors from these patches I'm adding
> them here. Some of the patches have multiple "Authors" listed in the
> commitfest which may just be people who posted updated patches so I
> may have added more people than n
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 11:58:28AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> But I'm unclear exactly what the consequences in the commitfest app
> are of specific state changes. As I understand it there are basically
> two alternatives:
>
> 1) Returned with feedback -- does this make it harder for an author to
Greg Stark writes:
> Do I have this right? What is the right state to put a patch in that
> means "this patch doesn't need to be triaged again unless the author
> actually feels progress has been made and needs new feedback or thinks
> its committable"?
But that's not really the goal, is it? IST
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 07:12, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Thanks for picking it up and continuing with recent developments. Let me know
> if you want a hand in triaging patchsets.
While I have the time there may be patches I may need help coming to
the right conclusions about what actions to take
> On 1 Mar 2022, at 17:16, Greg Stark wrote:
> Last November Daniel Gustafsson did a patch triage. It took him three
> emails to get through the patches in the commitfest back then.
It should be noted that I only powered through the patches that had been in 3+
commitfests at the time..
> Since
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 11:16:36AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> Last November Daniel Gustafsson did a patch triage. It took him three
> emails to get through the patches in the commitfest back then. Since
> then we've had the November and the January commitfests so I was
> interested to see how ma
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 14:59, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> As Justin suggested I CC the authors from these patches I'm adding
> them here. Some of the patches have multiple "Authors" listed in the
> commitfest which may just be people who posted updated patches so I
> may have added more people than neces
As Justin suggested I CC the authors from these patches I'm adding
them here. Some of the patches have multiple "Authors" listed in the
commitfest which may just be people who posted updated patches so I
may have added more people than necessary.
[If you received two copies of this do not reply to
Can I suggest to copy the patch authors on bulk emails like these ?
(Obviously, an extended discussion about a particular patch should happen on
its original thread, but that's not what this is about).
--
Justin
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 11:16:36AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> > 1608: schema variables, LET command
> > ===
> > After 18 CF's and two very long threads it seems to be nearing completion
> > judging by Tomas' review. There is an ask in that review for a second
Last November Daniel Gustafsson did a patch triage. It took him three
emails to get through the patches in the commitfest back then. Since
then we've had the November and the January commitfests so I was
interested to see how many of these patches had advanced
I'm only part way through the fi
12 matches
Mail list logo
