Li Japin writes:
> I find the build_regexp_split_result() has redundant codes, we can move it to
> before the condition check, can we?
Hm, yeah, that looks a bit strange. It was less strange before
c8ea87e4bd950572cba4575e9a62284cebf85ac5, I think.
Pushed with some additional simplification to
Hi hackers,
I find the build_regexp_split_result() has redundant codes, we can move it to
before the condition check, can we?
Best regards.
Japin Li
0001-Code-cleanup-for-build_regexp_split_result.patch
Description: 0001-Code-cleanup-for-build_regexp_split_result.patch