On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 10:58 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-03-02 06:46:23 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > From a9344bb2fb2a363bec4be526f87560cb212ca10b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Thomas Munro
> > Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:27:05 +1300
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] Wake up for latches in C
Hi,
On 2022-03-02 06:46:23 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I do think it's worth giving that sleep a proper wait event though, even in
> > the back branches.
>
> I'm thinking that 0002 should be back-patched all the way, but 0001
> could be limited to 14.
No strong opinion on back to where to ba
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:36 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> On February 27, 2022 4:19:21 PM PST, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
> >It seems a little strange to introduce a new wait event that will very
> >often appear into a stable branch, but ... it is actually telling the
> >truth, so there is that.
>
> In
Hi,
On February 27, 2022 4:19:21 PM PST, Thomas Munro
wrote:
>With the attached, 027_stream_regress.pl drops from ~29.5s to ~19.6s
>on my FreeBSD workstation!
That's impressive - wouldn't have guessed it to make that much of a difference.
I assume that running the tests on freebsd for an olde
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 10:29 PM Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 06:10:45PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 01:39:42PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > I suspect the easiest is to just convert that usleep to a WaitLatch().
> > > That'd
> > > require addi
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 06:10:45PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 01:39:42PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I suspect the easiest is to just convert that usleep to a WaitLatch().
> > That'd
> > require adding a new enum value to WaitEventTimeout in 14. Which probably is
>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 01:39:42PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I suspect the easiest is to just convert that usleep to a WaitLatch(). That'd
> require adding a new enum value to WaitEventTimeout in 14. Which probably is
> fine?
We've added wait events in back-branches in the past, so this does n
Hi,
In two recent investigations in occasional test failures
(019_replslot_limit.pl failures, AIO rebase) the problems are somehow tied to
checkpointer.
I don't yet know if actually causally related to precisely those failures, but
when running e.g. 027_stream_regress.pl, I see phases in which ma
