Hello, Thanks all!
At Sat, 13 Jul 2019 11:17:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote in
<18372.1563031...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Tomas Vondra writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm pretty sure this change has been proposed before, and rejected before.
> >> Has anybody excavat
Mmm.
# I eventually found messages sent to me stashed in unexpcted
# place. I felt I was in a void space for these days.. That's
# silly!
Thank you for the comment.
# Putting aside the appliability(?) of this check..
At Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:14:57 +0200, Tomas Vondra
wrote in <20190712111457.ek
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 11:17 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> If the spec is allowing this because it can be seen
> to be safe, why should we not allow other cases that the user has
> taken the trouble to prove to themselves are safe? (If their proof is
> wrong, well, it wouldn't be the first bug in anyone'
Tomas Vondra writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure this change has been proposed before, and rejected before.
>> Has anybody excavated in the archives for prior discussions?
> Yes, I've done some quick searches like "volatile constraint" and so on.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Tomas Vondra writes:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:00:25PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Mutable function are allowed in check constraint expressions but
it is not right. The attached is a proposed fix for it including
regression test.
Ye
Tomas Vondra writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:00:25PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> Mutable function are allowed in check constraint expressions but
>>> it is not right. The attached is a proposed fix for it including
>>> regression test.
> Yes, and the question is whether this is the right
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:00:25PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
pá 12. 7. 2019 v 13:11 odesílatel Tomas Vondra
napsal:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:55:20AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>Hi
>
>pá 12. 7. 2019 v 8:45 odesílatel Kyotaro Horiguchi <
horikyota@gmail.com>
>napsal:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> A
pá 12. 7. 2019 v 13:11 odesílatel Tomas Vondra
napsal:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:55:20AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >pá 12. 7. 2019 v 8:45 odesílatel Kyotaro Horiguchi <
> horikyota@gmail.com>
> >napsal:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> As mentioned in the following message:
> >>
> >
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 03:44:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Hello.
As mentioned in the following message:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190712.150527.145133646.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
Mutable function are allowed in check constraint expressions but
it is not right. The attac
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:55:20AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi
pá 12. 7. 2019 v 8:45 odesílatel Kyotaro Horiguchi
napsal:
Hello.
As mentioned in the following message:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190712.150527.145133646.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
Mutable function are allowed
Hi
pá 12. 7. 2019 v 8:45 odesílatel Kyotaro Horiguchi
napsal:
> Hello.
>
> As mentioned in the following message:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190712.150527.145133646.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
>
> Mutable function are allowed in check constraint expressions but
> it is not right
Hello.
As mentioned in the following message:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190712.150527.145133646.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
Mutable function are allowed in check constraint expressions but
it is not right. The attached is a proposed fix for it including
regression test.
Other "const
12 matches
Mail list logo
