Thank you for review and commit.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:12 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:01:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:22:28AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> >> On 2018/12/15 8:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>> I tend to agree with
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:01:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:22:28AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/12/15 8:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> I tend to agree with your comment here. pg_tables lists partitioned
>>> tables, but pg_indexes is forgotting about part
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:22:28AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/12/15 8:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I tend to agree with your comment here. pg_tables lists partitioned
>> tables, but pg_indexes is forgotting about partitioned indexes. So this
>> is a good thing to add.
>
> +1
I'll go
Hi,
On 2018/12/15 8:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 05:21:49PM +0530, Suraj Kharage wrote:
>> There are some catalog views which do not show the partitioned table and
>> its index entry.
>> One of them is "pg_indexes" which failed to show the partitioned index.
>> Attached the
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 05:21:49PM +0530, Suraj Kharage wrote:
> There are some catalog views which do not show the partitioned table and
> its index entry.
> One of them is "pg_indexes" which failed to show the partitioned index.
> Attached the patch which fixes the same.
I tend to agree with you
Hi,
There are some catalog views which do not show the partitioned table and
its index entry.
One of them is "pg_indexes" which failed to show the partitioned index.
Attached the patch which fixes the same.
Other views such as pg_stat*,pg_statio_* has the same problem for
partitioned tables and i
