On 30/04/18 22:00, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Perhaps that would be OK, if it was properly commented. But it's not
actually hard to make BufFileSize() work on shared files, too, so I think we
should do that.
I agree that this could use a
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Perhaps that would be OK, if it was properly commented. But it's not
> actually hard to make BufFileSize() work on shared files, too, so I think we
> should do that.
I agree that this could use a comment, but I don't see much point in
Hi,
I've been noodling around the tuplesort/logtape code, reviewing the
changes that were made in v11 to support parallel sorting, and also
rebasing my older patch to replace the polyphase merge with a simple
balanced merge.
Looking at TapeShare:
/*
* The approach tuplesort.c takes to par
