On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 2:42 PM Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:22:49AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Committed. I removed the changes from the .po files since we don't
> > routinely update those, and I rewrote your proposal commit message.
>
> nitpick: It looks like this needs
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:22:49AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Committed. I removed the changes from the .po files since we don't
> routinely update those, and I rewrote your proposal commit message.
nitpick: It looks like this needs a pgindent [0].
[0]
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/s
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 7:40 AM Jakub Wartak
wrote:
> v2 attached, rebased and tested.
Committed. I removed the changes from the .po files since we don't
routinely update those, and I rewrote your proposal commit message.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 12:55 PM Jakub Wartak
wrote:
Hi
[..]
> OK, so attached is a small patch to eradicate this HINT: CI tested,
> verified using original reproducer, registered in cf app.
v2 attached, rebased and tested.
-J.
v2-0001-Remove-HINT-message-for-unexpected-data-beyond-EO.patch
Des
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:12 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I think we should just drop the HINT. We really have no clue what caused
> it and a HINT should imo have at least some value other than "*Shrug*", which
> is imo pretty much what these HINTs amount to, if they were a bit more blunt.
I
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 3:59 PM Andres Freund wrote:
Hi Robert, Andres, Christoph,
> On 2025-04-01 09:49:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 7:13 AM Jakub Wartak
> > wrote:
> > > Thread bump. So we have the following candidates:
> > >
> > > 1. remove it as Andres stated:
> >
Hi,
On 2025-04-01 09:49:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 7:13 AM Jakub Wartak
> wrote:
> > Thread bump. So we have the following candidates:
> >
> > 1. remove it as Andres stated:
> > ERROR: unexpected data beyond EOF in block 1472 of relation base/5/16387
> >
> > 2a. Robert
Re: Robert Haas
> > Another question is should we back-patch this? I believe we should (?)
>
> I don't think this qualifies as a bug. The current wording isn't
> factually wrong, just unhelpful. Even if it were wrong, we need a
> pretty good reason to change message strings in a stable branch,
> b
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:54 AM Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Robert Haas
> > > Another question is should we back-patch this? I believe we should (?)
> > I don't think this qualifies as a bug. The current wording isn't
> > factually wrong, just unhelpful. Even if it were wrong, we need a
> > pretty
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 7:13 AM Jakub Wartak
wrote:
> Thread bump. So we have the following candidates:
>
> 1. remove it as Andres stated:
> ERROR: unexpected data beyond EOF in block 1472 of relation base/5/16387
>
> 2a. Robert's idea
> ERROR: unexpected data beyond EOF in block 1472 of relation
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 4:00 PM Christoph Berg wrote:
>
> Re: Robert Haas
> > I think that would be better than what we have now, but I still wonder
> > if we should give some kind of a hint that an external process may be
> > doing something to that file. Jakub and I may be biased by having just
Re: Robert Haas
> I think that would be better than what we have now, but I still wonder
> if we should give some kind of a hint that an external process may be
> doing something to that file. Jakub and I may be biased by having just
> seen a case of exactly that in the field, but I wonder now how
Hi,
On 2025-03-27 10:25:50 +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 4:01 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> [..]
> > > so how about:
> > > -HINT: This has been seen to occur with buggy kernels; consider
> > > updating your system.
> > > +HINT: This has been observed with files being overwritte
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 4:01 PM Robert Haas wrote:
[..]
> > so how about:
> > -HINT: This has been seen to occur with buggy kernels; consider
> > updating your system.
> > +HINT: This has been observed with files being overwritten, buggy
> > kernels and potentially other external file system inf
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 4:59 AM Jakub Wartak
wrote:
> ERROR: unexpected data beyond EOF in block 1472 of relation base/5/16387
> HINT: This has been seen to occur with buggy kernels; consider
> updating your system.
>
> to something more generic and less confusing. It is coming from
> ffae5cc5a6
I would like to propose that we tweak the following error message:
ERROR: unexpected data beyond EOF in block 1472 of relation base/5/16387
HINT: This has been seen to occur with buggy kernels; consider
updating your system.
to something more generic and less confusing. It is coming from
ffae5c
16 matches
Mail list logo
