Committed.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:57:25AM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> My mistake. Attached please find version 3, which should hopefully make
> cfbot happy again.
Here is what I have staged for commit. I plan to commit this within the
next few days.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:tested, passed
Did a quick review of this one; CFbot is now happy, local regress
My mistake. Attached please find version 3, which should hopefully make
cfbot happy again.
pgbench.dash.d.or.not.dash.d.v3.patch
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 09:15:22PM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Rebased version attached (v2), with another sentence in the sgml to explain
> the optional use of -d
cfbot seems quite unhappy with this:
https://cirrus-ci.com/build/6429518263484416
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Serv
Rebased version attached (v2), with another sentence in the sgml to explain
the optional use of -d
Cheers,
Greg
pgbench.dash.d.or.not.dash.d.v2.patch
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:47:53PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:59:36PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> All in all, I support the original patch.
>
> I'll commit this in a few days if there are no objections.
Actually, I just took a look at the patch and it appears to
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:59:36PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> All in all, I support the original patch.
I'll commit this in a few days if there are no objections.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
On 2024-Mar-01, Euler Taveira wrote:
> I don't like to break backward compatibility but in this case I suspect that
> it
> is ok. I don't recall the last time I saw a script that makes use of -d
> option.
> How often do you need a pgbench debug information?
I wondered what the difference actual
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024, at 8:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 3/1/24 23:41, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> >
> > I think this is a generally reasonable proposal, except I don't know
> > whether this breakage is acceptable. AFAICT there are two fundamental
> > behavior changes folks would observe:
> >
> > *
On 3/1/24 23:41, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 07:05:13PM -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>> Attached please find a patch to adjust the behavior of the pgbench program
>> and make it behave like the other programs that connect to a database
>> (namely, psql and pg_dump). Specifi
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 07:05:13PM -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Attached please find a patch to adjust the behavior of the pgbench program
> and make it behave like the other programs that connect to a database
> (namely, psql and pg_dump). Specifically, add support for using -d and
> --dbna
Attached please find a patch to adjust the behavior of the pgbench program
and make it behave like the other programs that connect to a database
(namely, psql and pg_dump). Specifically, add support for using -d and
--dbname to specify the name of the database. This means that -d can no
longer be u
13 matches
Mail list logo
